Leica sl。 Is the Leica SL Still Relevant in 2019?

SL

leica sl

Yes, it is good, but good for whom? But except for that one example there maybe one I've not tried they lag Leica for optical quality. Now now I can't personally attack an Internet entity named Howaboutraw : I choose to attack your logic and reasoning. I like the way my comments were cherry picked. Mind you, one of my Facebook friends said: the M and the Q have the same problem and Leica never fixed this in firmware. To further increase their effectiveness, we flock the inner surfaces, which ensures that the lens hoods remain effective, even after many years of intensive use. Even then, the best camera was and is a Leica. In your insecurity, you just had to post cliched Leica bashing. In bad light situations, both about equal. No, no, sorry to burst your bubble but I'm far from angry. The diopter is brilliant, just twist the dial behind the massive viewfinder. Leica, and Zeiss, both know things about optics that Nikon doesn't. Leica do not have the optically best lenses at those other focal lengths. The focusing settings can also be fine-tuned by the user to adjust the behavior and tolerances for tracking. Leica hasn't been called Leitz since 1986. It is simply the best camera, because it helps to produce the best pics. Thanks to this shallow depth of field and exceptional imaging performance, every single lens guarantees the special look for which Leica photography is renowned. I could have easily used the zoom. Canikon sure is better for other things. The resolution is ok for my needs, picture-quality is very satisfying. That is ultimately the reason to buy a Leica: the lenses. For me photography brings more fun than a new car. As for my opinion of the X1D, I have my raws from those 3 bodies and lenses. Also having Leica gear say for some work doesn't preclude also using Canikon gear or Fuji or Olympus. This is also my personal experience - Leica lenses look not too spectacular at first sight. Use Canon in my day job and gave what some people would describe as a dream kit of every prime and zoom L lens right through the range probably well in excess of £30,000 worth. Lines and edges - like the Leica's design. It's big, beautiful and detailed, and is a benchmark even now, over a year after its introduction. It is also my least favorite lens. All in all, yes you can use this metod with moderate distortions but with extreme ones is a diffrent story. Photo by Carey Rose For one last time, I'm going to bring up the 'EyeRes' electronic viewfinder. Thanks for making your own double post example though. With M lenses there is a slight disadvantage in a studio. Exactly, let the market decide. Not my cup of tea, but in my early years I spend quite a lot of time in studios, working on my skills, so I know how it works. It seems you think it's a way to get your leg over everyone else but sadly it also seems that is all you have. Sometimes I have to hand my camera to other people. Feeling that I am a liar doesn't make it so. There being one expensive Nikon exception and one Tamron exception, this latter is rumored to be related to a Zeiss design. The mount is used by the discontinued , , and systems. Let's get something out of the way right from the start: Leicas are not for the budget-conscious. I can't imagine how good the next version is going to be. You can shoot it as if you were using primes. With the A7 I always think that if I squeeze it a little harder, it will break into thousand pieces. The 2nd was with a lens, I have read many comments over the years on forums from those who just hate on this camera because of the red dot. The real genius is not one component of the system but the system itself. It was a rainy day and already 3 p. I am planning to transition from my m9p to something. Sleek, sexy, smooth, solid, minimal and beautiful. No one should find that acceptable. Do tell how you have used the X1D? It is what I use to shoot most of my landscapes. About two-thirds of my photos are shot with my camera on a tripod. Albeit I see some sample variation in the bigger zoom, so need to find raws shot with a third example. I am quite secure in the fact that Leica's optically better lenses are hard to beat; Canikon doesn't equal Leica's best. You get a fantastic 47-megapixel full-frame sensor capable of incredibly sharp, wonderfully saturated images, and some of the best support for high-end video you'll find in a mirrorless camera system. I know despite the lenses the results will be worse than with another make and that should never be true of Leica. I mean, it is good by the standards set five years ago, but not by 2019 standards. I know this is not the workhorse type of camera most people would choise, niether do I and others will miss the gray finished body's as am I yet I see sleek desings, sleek menu's and when I touch one its gives me butterfly's. Everything seemed really logical and very simple to use. There are eight buttons total and six of those can be customized to your liking. Again drop the cliched Leica bashing. Colors tend to be muted with an overall greenish cast, which is a surefire way to zombify portrait subjects. So you need to use it in a slightly different way. Not all cameras with the red dot are equal… Back to the car analogy: it would make more sense if the car buyer with a certain budget has a type of car in mind that he wishes to drive in and then simply visits a number of dealers to decide which car he likes best. Despite being a beautifully built camera capable of exceptional images, I just don't see it measuring up in a crowded market of objectively better, cheaper and more flexible options yes, I fully expect to be burned at the stake in the comments for that opinion; maybe I'll make it my epitaph. You are assuming I haven't tried it. I was planning to get the 24-105 S lens to keep the cost down. It was introduced by the in April 2014. Maybe, we will run into each other in South Lake Union someday and I'll buy you a cup of coffee, or cappuccino if you can't lift the coffee. And Fuji's lenses for the X system are generally optically better than Canikon lenses. It shows Leica is actually thinking about the pro studio user. And there are two, or 3, 50mm M lenses that score better than all those other 50s. Logo of the L-mount alliance Type Bayonet, digital interface Inner diameter 51. But I drive a car older than 20 years. Yeah but Sony cameras are pig awful to use. Dave O: Those optically better Leica lenses, today in 2017, are still a compelling reason to shoot Leicas in place of Canons or Nikons, with Canon and Nikon lenses. In the design of the lenses, particular care has been taken to ensure homogeneous performance at all focal lengths, apertures, and focusing distances. And then the focus and metering slider is 3 clicks from the right even though it lags in that performance category? So really anything but a rush job, actually well planned. But as you know it's depends on which M lenses you have too. Why do I mention the lenses? Compared to other cams they look way too expensive on paper. The single image is not that different. The negatives are less saturated than the results I got from the manual lens. Your word is about as meaningful as Greek to me! In addition to this, Leica AquaDura ® coating provides effective protection of the exposed surfaces of lenses against dirt and scratching. And Sigma looks to be heading in the right direction. The fact that it can be turned of is great though. I bought the Visoflex type 020 for my M10 and i really like it. Does this camera deserve an 84 score? I am getting older as well and with me my eyes, so manual focus is not as accurate as it used to be. It has put some serious thought into its menus, especially the way Photo and Video-related features are separated out, yet both easy to access and change. You mention the lenses being big and heavy and the combination of the two, body and lens, feeling awkward to handle. You can't avoid insults, and you need to issue put-downs. Speaking of touch, the screen is very high quality, and the touch response is excellent. We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing in conjunction with this review , we do so in good faith, please don't abuse it. Sigma announced that it will launch a full-frame camera in 2019, using the L-Mount and the company's sensor, as well as a range of L-mount lenses and for and lenses. As stated elsewhere, I have more keepers with them. To me it looks like a pre-production model. I made photos on multiple focal lengths: f2, f5. What I like less is the fact that you have to use more buttons and wheels than with the M. I'd like you to try and say that sentence to anyone from an absolute 13 year-old amateur to an 80 year-old professional cinematographer, and see the reaction they get on their face. It's all rather mildly amusing and entertaining watching you squirm and using your red dot as if it were a badge of honour. I am not that sure about digital correction solving all the perspective problems. I wouldn't touch it for half the money. By the way, very nice review, thank you for that great work you guys do! Maybe for you, but that is only partially true for me. And I never expected it to be, why do you? Will be returning the S1R this week. No test because most modern cameras have a big problem in this area? Auni - Agreed on the viewfinder blackout. It seems to just make me smile more. This lens is my best ever investment regarding the number of pics I took with it. First impressions were excellent, but when tests continued and were refined, some weak spots turned up e. Drop to 7 fps and you get all of those back. There is no plastic anywhere to be found. Thanks for the condescension, though. It costs about the same and it's smaller! Did you expect to be left unchallenged? It reacts quickly and intuitively. But what i like the most: this camera just works. In doing so, in making a camera seemingly aimed at maximum practicality - as a tool for creating images and less as an experience - they've robbed it of some of that intangible charm that usually accompanies their products. Been niggling me that I wanted something to reignite the passion for weekends and holidays. Also, like the X1D, those lenses are slower. Leica really nailed the color. You only have your word to back up your statements. According to you this would be a bad choice as this is just a small number of cars, so must be an inferior product. It was not as easy to use on the 5Ds - dof control was quite cumbersome. It was announced in 1987 - exactly 30 years ago. I will not be sharing my raws. I haven't been in Seattle in 25 years and then it was only for a few days. The attention to detail is fantastic. You may call it cliched Leica bashing if you like. By the way, I have shared some photos over on my photoblog. And I'd have agreed with them until 10 days ago. It was huge, it was expensive and the glass was also quite large. I always bought black models so the spouse would not be prompted to offer a challenge. I used to lust after a Leica but not now. Learn to be respectful of people rather than go on the attack. Lots of people claim to see pink fluffy unicorns and testify to their existence but no scientific evidence can prove they actually exist. I state this because imagine buying one only for Leica about 6 months down the line bringing a Mk2 version out with a ergonomically better grip, rounded edges and so forth. But did you experience the same? With my wife being an artistic nude photographer, I joined her on a shoot and we exchanged cameras a few times. This gets funnier and funnier. When I got there, the light turned out to be quite unflattering, but also abundant. At least give it a try in a shop, or even rent it for a few days. Leica binoculars are excellent, so are Meopta's. There are lots of things a Subaru will do that a Ferrari won't, but the Ferrari will do a few things spectacularly better than that Subaru. Way to many issues to put such a potential great camera out on the market. However, they are so clear and ultra-thin, I forget that I'm wearing glasses. The only red dot I want is followed by a M, still I like their designs. Set those lenses wide open as well, and your S1 shutter selection to automatic to allow full sun shooting wide open. We updated it a little bit to work better with such lenses through lens adapters. It produces a medium format type of look. Those Zeiss Batis for the Sony A7 body series are optically excellent. Right it has fewer pixels, don't go down the downsampling claims hall of mendacities. Lovely lovely cameras that can stand the test of time. There is hardly an aberration, and the images were sharp. Not the one with the most beautiful single goal or basket. Acquisition speeds drop as ambient light levels do, though, and subject tracking is often hit or miss, often failing to acquire but tracking relatively well when it does. This is the way menus should be done. As you probably know, I am a sucker for 50mm lenses. Fot the first you would need very high resolution camera as the software interpolates while keystoning. Again it all points to a rush job. Which Leica 300mm is better than the Nikon 2. Stop pretending that ever said Leica makes the focal length range of Nikon, or Canon, you look ignorant. Adapted Minolta M-Rokkor 40mm F2. Sony could probably avoid this with better heat control, perhaps via firmware. Add in 5 Axis for smooth video and call it a day. I also recommend taking some of the classes offered by the Leica Academy. The contrast and colors are excellent. There's the Epson R-D1, it mounts M lenses. Nor am I considering either of the Panasonic L offerings, though I do not doubt that they are excellent. In the days of film to show off your camera and lens then put some Kodachrome 25 in it. You may hate it, or hate shooting manual lenses but for me it is like therapy to do so. Too late to edit, but I need to add this. The M240 like the M9 had color issues. It makes me jump into the air. Then also you didn't like the fact that I'm familiar with the X1D. But you need to look at the total equipment - this is a much fairer comparison. Duh, it's reasonably expensive for a camera body, in the range of pro Canikon bodies--while much less than serious Phase medium format bodies. Although after that one day my shoulder was glad to go back to my nice toy nonetheless. The Leica has also taken a welcome agnostic approach to buttons. I can be short about that: it is all true. To get that kind of optical performance on the above list, excluding the K1, you'll need newer Zeiss or SonyZeiss lenses. There is certainly a very large segment of pro shooters that could take outstanding photos with any of the lenses and bodies form any these three manufacturers. The third with the , manually focused. And in the end, what you get is just a good camera that's fairly capable and has a luxury tax. This camera should be compare with something like painting - very pleasant to look at but no good to take outdoors. Also I suspect you mean winding lever, film cameras have rewind crank arms generally--well, if there's no motor. I rarely shoot in extreme light or speed situations. Looking at comparable reviews of pros and cons, I am thinking this thing should have checked in at a 78 or so. This would outsell everything else in their lineup, guaranteed. All it needs to bring them together is a single ring: the Leica M-Adapter L. I only have the original zoom and I'm deciding if I am going to go back to the M for a while. And you started with the bashing. For me, the magic lies with using these small, manually focused lenses. Burst shooting at 11 fps is impressive, but focus, exposure and white balance are locked. The first three images below, I believe were take with. Yes its typical Leica design with its minimalistic looks and controls but is it too early to go and get one? These new technical achievements paired with a large 3. So weight and size are all relative. Your knowledge will increase exponentially, and you will realize that fantastic photos are all around you. It's bigger and heavier than any of the I've used—and heavier than the , a very similar camera body. It is a little less warm and a tad less analog. If you use Leica R glass then you are about on the same level as Zeiss again. While I can say I've tried the X1D. It had been a very long time since I shot with 11 frames per second, but I had to try it out anyway. Nothing is labeled, but you get used to what does what and you can customize most every button's 'long press' behavior which, if not the fastest method of customized controls, is a neat touch. But, if I maybe blunt, an amateur brought the camera then okay they have the money but to me, I use my gear as a keen hobbyist. Want a digital camera with a winding lever? No kidding you don't care about your case. You can get better performance in specific areas in one camera over another, you can get higher resolution from some cameras, but overall, a modern 24mpix camera and good lenses could keep most any still photographer working today happy for a lifetime. However, a recent vacation in Cape Town, South Africa with my M10-P left me with a certainty. Once again, the engineering genius is made by Leica, but the photo genius is in you! You've provide zero raws that counter my point. This keeps the camera lighter and well balanced as well as one of the best manual focus digital cameras on earth today. What would you consider a Better solution. Where most people use techniques like multiple exposures and are more adventures, my style is very staid. You like Toyota, so you visit a showroom. If you want continuous focus and exposure, you'll need to drop down to the slower 6 frames per second burst rate. And I've mentioned plenty of other lens names. Sure, it is nowhere close to beating its M counterpart, but it is a worthy progeny. Do I go around and tell others that their cars are too expensive? Two with the lovely little 35 f2 Ultron from Voigtlander in low light. The autofocus is reasonably fast, and there's phase detect focusing, face detect, and various ways to tweak and optimize the autofocus defaults. Because lenses and the rest of the gear make up 80-90 % of all costs. Otus, Noctilux, tilt-shift lenses from CaNikon, or Leica M and R. To me, the Q has a more distinct 'personality,' not least of which because of the limitations imposed by a single, fixed lens. The other problem is that taking pict with extreme wide causing extreme covergence the result is tha object seems to lean back as the lens is not parralel to object. It's true that the camera body isn't terribly bad to hold on its own, but attaching the native lenses results in a perturbingly unbalanced experience that gave me a unique wrist pain, even during casual use. While she usually works with an M and a 5D3, we left the M for what it was this time. Large and easy to rotate to dial in the perfect focus for your eyes. Sorry, I've tried all the cameras I reference, and am very clear when I've not. I don't own a Leica of any description neither do I feel a need for one, but judging a camera by the numbers it produces on paper is missing the point. This better integration is certainly an important factor. But if you don't have the cash, I wouldn't worry too much about what you're missing. But this is a big error on your part. I've tried, rented, owned, used the lenses, you haven't. The idea is to make bright images in the camera that have a certain monochromatic feeling to them without even using Photoshop. While shooting, I immediately felt what I did many years ago when I still used zooms. These demand particularly high precision in the manufacturing process: departures from specified surface curvatures must be within tolerances measured in tenths of micrometers. Nowadays the sensors are quite similar not identical, but not too far away in performance , like the films were.。 。 。 。 。 。

次の

New Leica SL and Leica CL firmware updates released

leica sl

。 。 。 。 。 。

次の

Is the Leica SL Still Relevant in 2019?

leica sl

。 。 。 。 。

次の

The Leica SL review

leica sl

。 。 。 。 。

次の

Leica L

leica sl

。 。 。 。 。

次の

Downloads // Support // Service & Support

leica sl

。 。 。 。 。

次の